- Home
- Featured Publications
- Center Publications
- Ambulatory glucose profile analysis of the juvenile diabetes research foundation continuous glucose monitoring dataset-Applications to the pediatric diabetes population.
Ambulatory glucose profile analysis of the juvenile diabetes research foundation continuous glucose monitoring dataset-Applications to the pediatric diabetes population.
Citation | “Ambulatory Glucose Profile Analysis Of The Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Dataset-Applications To The Pediatric Diabetes Population.”. Pediatric Diabetes, pp. 622-628. . |
Center | Stanford University |
Author | Gregory P Forlenza, Laura L Pyle, David M Maahs, Timothy C Dunn |
Keywords | ambulatory glucose profile, Continuous glucose monitor, diabetes |
Abstract |
BACKGROUND: Increased continuous glucose monitor (CGM) use presents both the benefit and burden of increased data for clinicians to rapidly analyze. The ambulatory glucose profile (AGP) is an evolving a universal software report for CGM data analysis. OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESES: We utilized the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation-CGM dataset to evaluate the AGP across a broad spectrum of patients to show how AGP can be used clinically to assist with CGM-related decision making. We hypothesized that AGP metrics would be different across age and HbA1c strata. SUBJECTS: AGPs were generated from the JDRF-CGM trial dataset for all periods during which there were ≥10 days of CGM coverage in the 2 weeks adjacent to an HbA1c measurement yielding 1101 AGPs for 393 unique subjects. METHODS: AGPs were stratified by age group (8-14, 15-24, and ≥25 years) and HbA1c (within or above target for age) and compared for between group differences in AGP metrics via two-factor ANOVA. Glycemic differences between time periods were analyzed via segmented regression analysis. RESULTS: Glucose exposure (average and estimated A1c) and variability (standard deviation and interquartile range) were different between the low and high HbA1c levels. Within a given HbA1c level all age groups were significantly different from each other with older patients having lower averages with less variability than younger patients. CONCLUSIONS: AGP analysis of the JDRF-CGM data highlights significant differences in glycemic profiles between pediatric and adult age groups and between well and less well-controlled patient populations. |
Year of Publication |
2017
|
Journal |
Pediatric diabetes
|
Volume |
18
|
Issue |
7
|
Number of Pages |
622-628
|
Date Published |
11/2017
|
ISSN Number |
1399-5448
|
DOI |
10.1111/pedi.12474
|
Alternate Journal |
Pediatr Diabetes
|
PMID |
27878929
|
PMCID |
PMC7162536
|
Download citation |