Skip to main content

Effect of DECIDE (Decision-making Education for Choices In Diabetes Everyday) Program Delivery Modalities on Clinical and Behavioral Outcomes in Urban African Americans With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Trial.

Citation
Fitzpatrick, S. L., et al. “Effect Of Decide (Decision-Making Education For Choices In Diabetes Everyday) Program Delivery Modalities On Clinical And Behavioral Outcomes In Urban African Americans With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Trial.”. Diabetes Care, pp. 2149-2157.
Featured
Author Stephanie L Fitzpatrick, Sherita Hill Golden, Kerry Stewart, June Sutherland, Sharie DeGross, Tina Brown, Nae-Yuh Wang, Jerilyn Allen, Lisa A Cooper, Felicia Hill-Briggs
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of three delivery modalities of Decision-making Education for Choices In Diabetes Everyday (DECIDE), a nine-module, literacy-adapted diabetes and cardiovascular disease (CVD) education and problem-solving training, compared with an enhanced usual care (UC), on clinical and behavioral outcomes among urban African Americans with type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Eligible participants (n = 182) had a suboptimal CVD risk factor profile (A1C, blood pressure, and/or lipids). Participants were randomized to DECIDE Self-Study (n = 46), DECIDE Individual (n = 45), DECIDE Group (n = 46), or Enhanced UC (n = 45). Intervention duration was 18-20 weeks. Outcomes were A1C, blood pressure, lipids, problem-solving, disease knowledge, and self-care activities, all measured at baseline, 1 week, and 6 months after completion of the intervention.

RESULTS: DECIDE modalities and Enhanced UC did not significantly differ in clinical outcomes at 6 months postintervention. In participants with A1C ≥7.5% (58 mmol/mol) at baseline, A1C declined in each DECIDE modality at 1 week postintervention (P < 0.05) and only in Self-Study at 6 months postintervention (b = -0.24, P < 0.05). There was significant reduction in systolic blood pressure in Self-Study (b = -4.04) and Group (b = -3.59) at 6 months postintervention. Self-Study, Individual, and Enhanced UC had significant declines in LDL and Self-Study had an increase in HDL (b = 1.76, P < 0.05) at 6 months postintervention. Self-Study and Individual had a higher increase in knowledge than Enhanced UC (P < 0.05), and all arms improved in problem-solving (P < 0.01) at 6 months postintervention.

CONCLUSIONS: DECIDE modalities showed benefits after intervention. Self-Study demonstrated robust improvements across clinical and behavioral outcomes, suggesting program suitability for broader dissemination to populations with similar educational and literacy levels.

Year of Publication
2016
Journal
Diabetes care
Volume
39
Issue
12
Number of Pages
2149-2157
Date Published
12/2016
ISSN Number
1935-5548
Alternate Journal
Diabetes Care
PMID
27879359
PMCID
PMC5127230
Download citation