Skip to main content

Feasibility and behavioral effects of prolonged static and dynamic standing as compared to sitting in older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Citation
Marusic, U., et al. “Feasibility And Behavioral Effects Of Prolonged Static And Dynamic Standing As Compared To Sitting In Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.”. Bmc Geriatrics, p. 204.
Center University of Michigan
Author Uros Marusic, Martijn L T M Müller, Neil B Alexander, Nicolaas I Bohnen
Keywords Active working place, Cognitive functioning, Ergonomic adjustment, Executive functions, Metabolic consumption, Non-exercise physical activity
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physical inactivity is prevalent in older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and may exacerbate their clinical symptoms. The aim of this study was to examine the feasibility of 4-h regular versus more dynamic standing sessions while performing routine desktop activities as a non-exercise physical activity intervention in older adults with T2DM to increase non-exercise activity.

METHODS: Twelve older adult patients with T2DM (3 female; age 71 ± 4 years; Body mass index 34 ± 5 kg/m) completed three sessions (baseline sitting followed by "static" or "dynamic" desktop standing sessions). Participants stood behind a regular height-adjustable desk in the "static" standing session. An upright dynamic standing desk, which provides cues to make small weight-shifting movements, was used for the "dynamic" standing session. Oxygen consumption, cognitive performance, as well as net standing duration, total movement activity, and musculoskeletal discomfort were assessed during all three sessions.

RESULTS: All participants were able to complete all sessions. Oxygen consumption and overall movements progressively increased from sitting to static and dynamic standing, respectively (p < 0.001). The duration of breaks during standing (p = 0.024) and rate of total musculoskeletal discomfort development (p = 0.043) were lower in the dynamic standing compared to static standing sessions. There was no evidence of executive cognitive worsening during either standing session compared to sitting.

CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged 4-h standing as a simple non-exercise physical intervention is feasible in older adults with T2DM and may have metabolic (oxygen consumption) benefits. Increasing movement during desktop standing may offer incremental benefits compared to regular standing. Prolonged desktop standing might provide an effective intervention in T2DM older participants to target sedentariness.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04410055), retrospectively registered May 27, 2020.

Year of Publication
2020
Journal
BMC geriatrics
Volume
20
Issue
1
Number of Pages
204
Date Published
12/2020
ISSN Number
1471-2318
DOI
10.1186/s12877-020-01600-0
Alternate Journal
BMC Geriatr
PMID
32527223
PMCID
PMC7291508
Download citation