Skip to main content

Mobile-Enhanced Peer Support for African Americans with Type 2 Diabetes: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Citation
Presley, C., et al. “Mobile-Enhanced Peer Support For African Americans With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial.”. Journal Of General Internal Medicine, pp. 2889-2896.
Center University of Alabama at Birmingham
Author Caroline Presley, April Agne, Tanya Shelton, Robert Oster, Andrea Cherrington
Keywords diabetes self-management education, mobile health, peer support
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Peer support has been shown to improve diabetes self-management and control, but no standard exists to link peer support interventions to clinical care.

OBJECTIVE: To compare a community-based diabetes self-management education (DSME) plus mobile health (mHealth)-enhanced peer support intervention to community-based diabetes self-management education (DSME) alone for African American adults with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes.

DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial.

PARTICIPANTS: African American adults, age > 19 years, receiving care within a safety-net healthcare system in Jefferson County, Alabama, with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes and a hemoglobin A1c (A1C) ≥ 7.5%.

INTERVENTIONS: Participants in the intervention group received community-based diabetes self-management education (DSME) plus 6 months of mHealth-enhanced peer support, including 12 weekly phone calls, then 3 monthly calls from community health workers, who used a novel web application to communicate with participants' healthcare teams. In the control group, participants received community-based DSME alone.

MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was A1C; secondary outcomes included diabetes distress, depressive symptoms, self-efficacy or confidence in their ability to manage diabetes, and social support. We used mixed models repeated measures analyses to assess for between-arm differences and baseline to follow-up changes.

KEY RESULTS: Of 120 participants randomized, 97 completed the study. Participants in intervention and control groups experienced clinically meaningful reduction in A1C, 10.1 (SD 1.7) to 9.6 (SD 1.9) and 9.8 (SD 1.7) to 9.1 (SD 1.9) respectively, p = 0.004. Participants in the intervention group experienced a significantly larger reduction in diabetes distress compared to the control, 2.7 (SD 1.2) to 2.1 (1.0) versus 2.6 (SD 1.1) to 2.3 (SD 1.0) p = 0.041.

CONCLUSIONS: Community-based DSME with and without peer support led to improved glycemic control. Peer support linked to clinical care led to a larger reduction in diabetes distress, which has important implications for the overall wellbeing of adults with type 2 diabetes.

Year of Publication
2020
Journal
Journal of general internal medicine
Volume
35
Issue
10
Number of Pages
2889-2896
Date Published
10/2020
ISSN Number
1525-1497
DOI
10.1007/s11606-020-06011-w
Alternate Journal
J Gen Intern Med
PMID
32700215
PMCID
PMC7572958
Download citation