Skip to main content

Incidence and Risk Factors for Developing Diabetic Retinopathy among Youths with Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes throughout the United States.

Citation
Wang, S. Y., et al. “Incidence And Risk Factors For Developing Diabetic Retinopathy Among Youths With Type 1 Or Type 2 Diabetes Throughout The United States.”. Ophthalmology, pp. 424-430.
Center University of Michigan
Author Sophia Y Wang, Chris A Andrews, William H Herman, Thomas W Gardner, Joshua D Stein
Abstract

PURPOSE: Despite the increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) among children and adolescents, little is known about their risk of developing diabetic retinopathy (DR). We sought to identify risk factors for DR in youths with diabetes mellitus, to compare DR rates for youths with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and those with T2DM, and to assess whether adherence to DR screening guidelines promoted by the American Academy of Ophthalmology, American Academy of Pediatrics, and American Diabetes Association adequately capture youths with DR.

DESIGN: Retrospective observational longitudinal cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS: Youths aged ≤21 years with newly diagnosed T1DM or T2DM who were enrolled in a large US managed-care network.

METHODS: In this study of youths aged ≤21 years with newly diagnosed T1DM or T2DM who were under ophthalmic surveillance, we identified the incidence and timing of DR onset. Kaplan-Meier survival curves assessed the timing of initial diagnosis of DR for participants. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression modeling identified factors associated with the hazard of developing DR. Model predictors were age and calendar year at initial diabetes mellitus diagnosis, sex, race/ethnicity, net worth, and glycated hemoglobin A fraction (HbA).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for developing DR.

RESULTS: Among the 2240 youths with T1DM and 1768 youths with T2DM, 20.1% and 7.2% developed DR over a median follow-up time of 3.2 and 3.1 years, respectively. Survival curves demonstrated that youths with T1DM developed DR faster than youths with T2DM (P < 0.0001). For every 1-point increase in HbA, the hazard for DR increased by 20% (HR = 1.20; 95% CI 1.06-1.35) and 30% (HR = 1.30; 95% CI 1.08-1.56) among youths with T1DM and T2DM, respectively. Current guidelines suggest that ophthalmic screening begin 3 to 5 years after initial diabetes mellitus diagnosis, at which point in our study, >18% of youths with T1DM had already received ≥1 DR diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS: Youths with T1DM or T2DM exhibit a considerable risk for DR and should undergo regular screenings by eye-care professionals to ensure timely DR diagnosis and limit progression to vision-threatening disease.

Year of Publication
2017
Journal
Ophthalmology
Volume
124
Issue
4
Number of Pages
424-430
Date Published
12/2017
ISSN Number
1549-4713
DOI
10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.10.031
Alternate Journal
Ophthalmology
PMID
27914837
PMCID
PMC5728116
Download citation