Skip to main content

Sleep and Breathing the First Night After Adenotonsillectomy in Obese Children With Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Citation
De, A., et al. “Sleep And Breathing The First Night After Adenotonsillectomy In Obese Children With Obstructive Sleep Apnea.”. Journal Of Clinical Sleep Medicine : Jcsm : Official Publication Of The American Academy Of Sleep Medicine, pp. 805-811.
Center Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Author Aliva De, Temima Waltuch, Nathan J Gonik, Ngoc Nguyen-Famulare, Hiren Muzumdar, John P Bent, Carmen R Isasi, Sanghun Sin, Raanan Arens
Keywords OSA, adenotonsillar hypertrophy, adenotonsillectomy, Children, obese, Obstructive sleep apnea
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES: There are few studies measuring postoperative respiratory complications in obese children with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) undergoing adenotonsillectomy (AT). These complications are further compounded by perioperative medications. Our objective was to study obese children with OSA for their respiratory characteristics and sleep architecture on the night of AT.

METHODS: This was a prospective study at a tertiary pediatric hospital between January 2009-February 2012. Twenty obese children between 8-17 years of age with OSA and adenotonsillar hypertrophy were recruited. Patients underwent baseline polysomnography (PSG) and AT with or without additional debulking procedures, followed by a second PSG on the night of surgery. Demographic and clinical variables, surgical details, perioperative anesthetics and analgesics, and PSG respiratory and sleep architecture parameters were recorded. Statistical tests included Pearson correlation coefficient for correlation between continuous variables and chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for differences between groups.

RESULTS: Baseline PSG showed OSA with mean obstructive apnea-hypopnea index (oAHI) 27.1 ± 22.9, SpO nadir 80.1 ± 7.9%, and sleep fragmentation-arousal index 25.5 ± 22.0. Postoperatively, 85% of patients had abnormal sleep studies similar to baseline, with postoperative oAHI 27.0 ± 34.3 ( = .204), SpO nadir, 82.0 ± 8.7% ( = .462), and arousal index, 24.3 ± 24.0 ( = .295). Sleep architecture was abnormal after surgery, showing a significant decrease in REM sleep ( = .003), and a corresponding increase in N2 ( = .017).

CONCLUSIONS: Obese children undergoing AT for OSA are at increased risk for residual OSA on the night of surgery. Special considerations should be taken for postoperative monitoring and treatment of these children.

COMMENTARY: A commentary on this article appears in this issue on page 775.

Year of Publication
2017
Journal
Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine
Volume
13
Issue
6
Number of Pages
805-811
Date Published
06/2017
ISSN Number
1550-9397
DOI
10.5664/jcsm.6620
Alternate Journal
J Clin Sleep Med
PMID
28454600
PMCID
PMC5443741
Download citation