Skip to main content

Patient Perceptions and Preferences for a Mealtime Insulin Delivery Patch.

Citation
Peyrot, M., et al. “Patient Perceptions And Preferences For A Mealtime Insulin Delivery Patch.”. Diabetes Therapy : Research, Treatment And Education Of Diabetes And Related Disorders, pp. 297-307.
Center University of Michigan
Author Mark Peyrot, Darlene Dreon, Vivien Zraick, Brett Cross, Meng H Tan
Keywords diabetes mellitus, Insulin delivery, Patient preference, Quality of life
Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A basal-bolus insulin regimen is needed to achieve glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) below 7.0% in people with type 1 (T1D) or type 2 (T2D) diabetes who have significant loss of beta-cell function. Nonadherence to therapy is common and negatively affects the ability to reach treatment goals. We examined patient assessment of a new, wearable mealtime insulin-delivery system (patch) relative to their current mealtime insulin-delivery system (syringe, pen, or pump). The patch is designed to deliver only boluses of fast-acting insulin (no basal insulin), mechanically controlled by the patient.

METHODS: Adults (n = 101) with T1D or T2D assessed their current mealtime insulin-delivery system and then assessed simulated (no active medication) patch use over a 3-day period. Participants evaluated mealtime insulin-delivery systems using eight measures from five domains (convenience, interference with daily activities, diabetes-related worry, psychological well-being, and overall satisfaction/preference) on the self-administered Insulin Delivery System Rating Questionnaire. User ratings of their current insulin-delivery systems (syringe, pen, pump) were compared with those for the patch by repeated measure analysis of variance and one-sample t tests.

RESULTS: Participants had significant (p < 0.05) preference for patch over syringe in all eight comparisons, and over pen in five out of eight comparisons, with no significant preference for pen. Although there was a preference for patch over pump in six out of eight comparisons, only one showed a significant preference for patch, and one for pump. Significantly more participants reported that they would like to switch to the patch than continue using a syringe (78% vs 22%) or pen (76% vs 24%) but this difference was not significant for the group using a pump (52% vs 48%).

CONCLUSIONS: Participants preferred using the patch over pens and syringes. Its ease of use and discreet method of insulin delivery may contribute to improved patient adherence to mealtime insulin regimens among people currently using injection devices.

FUNDING: Calibra Medical.

Year of Publication
2018
Journal
Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders
Volume
9
Issue
1
Number of Pages
297-307
Date Published
02/2018
ISSN Number
1869-6953
DOI
10.1007/s13300-017-0365-1
Alternate Journal
Diabetes Ther
PMID
29327220
PMCID
PMC5801251
Download citation