Skip to main content

GLP-2 receptor signaling controls circulating bile acid levels but not glucose homeostasis in Gcgr mice and is dispensable for the metabolic benefits ensuing after vertical sleeve gastrectomy.

Citation
Patel, A., et al. “Glp-2 Receptor Signaling Controls Circulating Bile Acid Levels But Not Glucose Homeostasis In Gcgr Mice And Is Dispensable For The Metabolic Benefits Ensuing After Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy.”. Molecular Metabolism, pp. 45-54.
Center University of Michigan
Author Anita Patel, Bernardo Yusta, Dianne Matthews, Maureen J Charron, Randy J Seeley, Daniel J Drucker
Keywords Bariatric surgery, Bile Acids, diabetes, GLP-1, GLP-2, glucagon, glucose, obesity
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Therapeutic interventions that improve glucose homeostasis such as attenuation of glucagon receptor (Gcgr) signaling and bariatric surgery share common metabolic features conserved in mice and humans. These include increased circulating levels of bile acids (BA) and the proglucagon-derived peptides (PGDPs), GLP-1 and GLP-2. Whether BA acting through TGR5 (Gpbar1) increases PGDP levels in these scenarios has not been examined. Furthermore, although the importance of GLP-1 action has been interrogated in Gcgr mice and after bariatric surgery, whether GLP-2 contributes to the metabolic benefits of these interventions is not known.

METHODS: To assess whether BA acting through Gpbar1 mediates improved glucose homeostasis in Gcgr mice we generated and characterized Gcgr:Gpbar1 mice. The contribution of GLP-2 receptor (GLP-2R) signaling to intestinal and metabolic adaptation arising following loss of the Gcgr was studied in Gcgr:Glp2r mice. The role of the GLP-2R in the metabolic improvements evident after bariatric surgery was studied in high fat-fed Glp2r mice subjected to vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG).

RESULTS: Circulating levels of BA were markedly elevated yet similar in Gcgr:Gpbar1 vs. Gcgr:Gpbar1 mice. Loss of GLP-2R lowered levels of BA in Gcgr mice. Gcgr:Glp2r mice also exhibited shifts in the proportion of circulating BA species. Loss of Gpbar1 did not impact body weight, intestinal mass, or glucose homeostasis in Gcgr mice. In contrast, small bowel growth was attenuated in Gcgr:Glp2r mice. The improvement in glucose tolerance, elevated circulating levels of GLP-1, and glucose-stimulated insulin levels were not different in Gcgr:Glp2r vs. Gcgr:Glp2r mice. Similarly, loss of the GLP-2R did not attenuate the extent of weight loss and improvement in glucose control after VSG.

CONCLUSIONS: These findings reveal that GLP-2R controls BA levels and relative proportions of BA species in Gcgr mice. Nevertheless, the GLP-2R is not essential for i) control of body weight or glucose homeostasis in Gcgr mice or ii) metabolic improvements arising after VSG in high fat-fed mice. Furthermore, despite elevations of circulating levels of BA, Gpbar1 does not mediate elevated levels of PGDPs or major metabolic phenotypes in Gcgr mice. Collectively these findings refine our understanding of the relationship between Gpbar1, elevated levels of BA, PGDPs, and the GLP-2R in amelioration of metabolic derangements arising following loss of Gcgr signaling or after vertical sleeve gastrectomy.

Year of Publication
2018
Journal
Molecular metabolism
Volume
16
Number of Pages
45-54
Date Published
12/2018
ISSN Number
2212-8778
DOI
10.1016/j.molmet.2018.06.006
Alternate Journal
Mol Metab
PMID
29937214
PMCID
PMC6157461
Download citation